Economic Reboot. Peter Thiel (Part 2)

Forecast: "What's happening behind the doors of pseudo-negotiating processes" (published October 29, 2025, link)

S. Dragans:

...One of the key figures behind not only Trump but the very idea, which is not voiced but being implemented, is the well-known Peter Thiel.

Anticipating and perhaps planning the trajectory of global economic processes, there is a readiness for some significant, indeed epochal, economic collapse, which according to Thiel's plan is scheduled for late April 2026. This clearly refers to the time after April 20th, 2026, when an economic reset may be planned.

In Part 1, Confirmation on April 22nd confirmed the "economic collapse and the beginning of 'economic reboot'."

Now, it's important to understand: "What is Peter Thiel's role in these events of the "economic reboot"? What is the essence of the "very idea, which is not voiced but being implemented?"

We should start by looking at what the media has written about Peter Thiel: who is he? Why does he, among others, depend on the epic economic collapse of this fall? And here, we have to be content with not much information due to Peter Thiel's obvious desire to stay in the shadows of the events, and most importantly, his ability to hide this information.

Peter Thiel is the founder and main shareholder of PayPal and Palantir Technologies. He supported Trump as far back as 2016, and today he is considered the "godfather" of Vice President Jay Di Venna and most of the right technocrats behind the Republican administration.

In recent times, the process of merging "big tech" and the military has accelerated in the US. Leaders of four major tech companies in Silicon Valley - Palantir Technologies, Meta* (banned in Russia), OpenAI, and Thinking Machines Lab - have taken military oaths as lieutenant colonels in the US Army Reserve. One of them, OpenAI, has also signed a long-term contract with the Pentagon.

The painting is complemented by reports of the participation of digital company representatives and military personnel in another meeting of the members of the Bilderberg Group, indicating an awareness by the Western establishment of the growing role of digital technologies.

"He who owns the algorithms writes the rules. He who does not own them will live by someone else's protocols,"" wrote one network expert on this subject.

America's long-standing leadership in the field of armaments has been significantly ensured by the participation of the national defense department in setting tasks and funding scientific research. This principle has been followed by the Manhattan Project, which led to the creation of the GPS system, the internet, and Starlink working in favor of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Today, the Pentagon's interests are focused on the development of artificial intelligence (AI). Not only in applied areas, such as organizing cyberattacks or managing drone swarms. AI is already being used in situational analysis and the development of comprehensive management decisions.

Peter Thiel proposes more radical measures than his colleagues: they view AI as a tool to reshape warfare for U.S. dominance, while he, operating with concepts like God, Antichrist, and Armageddon, essentially admits to the intention of overturning the world's value system by using AI technologies in a new type of war.

Thiel's eschatological adventurism has not yet become a blueprint for action for Donald Trump's administration. This transition is delayed until the U.S. achieves (if they do) global hegemony through the "big number." Only then will proponents of the new digital thinking impose their anti-humanist strategy upon the supreme power.

In this, Thiel went much further than Democrats:

“We want more transformation than just dressing up like transvestites or changing gender like transsexuals. We want you to be able to change your heart, change your thinking, and change your whole body.”

AI enthusiasts and advocates of new-type wars found themselves in the circle of the new master of the White House, as they were able to offer a way to implement his slogan, "Make America Great Again." As representatives of "new money" - wealth earned through hard work and innovation - they genuinely support Trump's intention to "destroy the Deep State" and remove from power the elites who hold the "old money" inherited from their ancestors.

In fact, by the given S. Dragans' deadlines - April 19, 2026, the Peter Thiel-led Palantir "agreed to his plan," releasing a whole manifesto that, in essence, resembles more of a large preparation for a major war.

There are a total of 22 points, and mostly they discuss how technologies now have a direct link to the state and military power. Campaign leaders Alex Karp and Nicholas Zemiska reject the liberal Silicon Valley model and argue that engineers and the entire industry must participate in protecting and strengthening the state. And of course, AI software is a new type of weapon.

Palantir speaks of transitioning from soft power to hard power. Today, morality, rhetoric, and values in their manifesto are declared insufficient; software in the 21st century is a new deterrent, like nuclear weapons once were. Palantir no longer questions the permissibility. Now the question is simply who will achieve this new type of weapon first. The text also redistributes responsibility to everyone, to the entire society. Karp's company literally talks about a mobilizational state. But most importantly, you can read all of this here.

There's also a lot more about criticizing apps, liberal pluralism, excessive morality, etc.

A company manifesto is a full-fledged political foundation where choice becomes inevitability. Instead of regulation and discussion of decisions, they say it's otherwise impossible. Palantir wants to play the role of those who identify the enemy and possess the power. A private company that speaks of a mobilization state, effectively claiming sovereign functions outside democratic control.

Carp and Zemiska argue that elites are more effective than democracy and interpret reality in their manifesto through their own lens. Instead of human rule and human choice, they offer technofascism, and Palantir is the first technofascist company in the world.

Between the state's boot on the neck and technocrats living in an anti-utopian reality, many would choose the latter, but if before the debate was about trading freedom for personal welfare, now the debate shifts to a different plane. It's about fundamentally remaking the world. And do people want such a future where AI determines threats, or rather a schizophrenic paranoiac who controls this AI.

According to experts, one must consider Palantir as the first tech-fascist company in the world. How to defeat such "fascism" is something humanity has yet to figure out.

Subsequently, we will focus directly on other actions by Peter Thiel, who, remaining in the shadows, plays a pivotal role in promoting the ideas outlined in the manifesto. His perspectives, ideas, and theory, which he is advocating, require further in-depth study.

(continued)