April's plot related to the breakdown of NATO

Forecast: "A Look into the Future from September 2025" (published on September 26, 2025, link)

S. Dragun:

By March 29, 2026, there may be another plot involving the collapse of NATO.

Forecast: "Iran - Interference of Events and Forecast of a Broader Spectrum for the Near Future" (published on April 6, 2026)

S. Dragun:

... On April 4, 2026, ... NATO's affairs are worse than expected. The structure and main leadership will crumble...

In confirming "Another plot involving the collapse of NATO" on March 27, the growing rift between the US and other NATO countries due to the start of the war in the Persian Gulf is being discussed.

By the end of March - i.e. "by March 29, 2026, another plot involving the collapse of NATO has emerged."

"... Affairs within NATO are worse than expected. The structure and main leadership will crumble...

The collapse of NATO, as a subordinate to a unified military-political structure, was most vividly seen against the interests of its members in the wars in the Persian Gulf and Ukraine.

In the war in the Persian Gulf, despite US requests, European NATO countries continued to refuse to assist their transatlantic ally not only with military force but even by providing infrastructure facilities.

France does not allow US military transport planes to transit through its territory to Israel for the delivery of weapons. Italy does not permit its air bases to be used by US aviation for strikes against Iran.

The reason for the refusal - the late submission of the request. But, as experts note: "If the Europeans had found another reason - they would have just not let them in."

US relations on this issue are not much better with other alliance members.

Judging by the reaction of the US president, such "allied refusals" will not be left without a similar response from him.

As early as March 30, US President Donald Trump made a statement that the Strait of Hormuz would "open automatically" after the conflict with Iran ends.

"Well, I think it will open automatically," Trump said in an interview with the New York Post, commenting on the situation regarding the strait closure.

However, those who refused to assist the US were not left unnoticed. Trump once again stated that Iran "has no more strength." "And let the countries that use the strait go and open it," Trump added.

Moreover, European countries, NATO partners, cannot use the strait today. They can only impose restrictions on the uncontrolled and frequent rise in fuel prices at their gas stations. For example, in Germany, it is allowed to change the price once a day.

Furthermore, US President Donald Trump declares the possibility of the US withdrawing from NATO. This was written on April 1, 2026, by the Telegraph, citing its sources.

It is not specified, however, for what exact reason this is happening. But it is possible that this could happen due to the war in the Middle East.

"Trump is considering reorganizing NATO, aimed at punishing members who do not meet his funding demands," the foreign source statement reads.

Let's recall that earlier, Trump expressed dissatisfaction with NATO and EU countries not assisting the US in the Middle East conflict. After that, the UK stated possible aid, but the US leader did not accept it, once again referring to NATO as a "paper tiger."

In line with the president, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio states, "After the conflict with Iran, the United States will have to 'reassess the value of NATO to the United States', as the alliance becomes a 'one-way street,' according to a State Department statement."

Furthermore, it was precisely in the "area of March 29" that another "plot" emerged, testifying to the "lack of unity among NATO members". This time, regarding the issue of participating in aid to Ukraine.

At the Foreign Ministers' meeting of the G7 countries held on March 28 under Paris, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and European diplomat-in-chief Kaja Kallas exchanged unflattering views on the conflict in Ukraine. Witnesses to the conversation noted that it was held at a high pitch, with Rubio clearly irritated, and several European diplomats had to intervene to defuse the situation. What so angered Rubio and Kallas - in the material of Gazeta.Ru.

At the meeting of Foreign Ministers of the G7 countries, which took place in the restored ancient abbey of Vo-de-Serne, 40 kilometers from Paris, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio had a dispute with European diplomat-in-chief Kaja Kallas. The American portal Axios, citing witnesses of this scene, reports that Rubio was "clearly irritated" by his colleague's remarks.

As the publication writes, the debate was initiated by Kalas. She reminded Rubio that a year ago, at a similar meeting of G7 Foreign Ministers, he stated that "if Russia obstructs US efforts to end the war, American patience will snap and they will take new steps against the Kremlin."

"A year has passed, and Russia has not moved an inch. When will your patience snap?" - asked Kalas.

Three diplomats present during the conversation told Axios that Kalas received a sharp response from Rubio.

"We are doing everything possible to end the war. If you think you can do it better, act. We'll step aside." - said the US Secretary of State, raising his voice.

He also stated that Washington is trying to negotiate with both sides of the conflict, but only helps Ukraine - by providing it with weapons, intelligence, and other support.

But this also causes dissatisfaction among Europeans. After all, they now have to pay for American weapons. They lived too well when billions of US dollars flowed uncontrollably to Ukraine during the Biden administration and the European Commission could participate in the "distribution" of these funds.

... that by the beginning of April 2026, this organization will strive to merge with another organization. But all of this does not seem constructive or achievable. ... The collapse of NATO ... may reach its maximum level of ruin ... with even more obvious signs of a grand split around April 25, 2026 ...

(continued)