Zelensky's Fatal Step (Part 2)

Forecast: Belarus. Lukashenko. Zelensky. Global Trends Summer 2026. Main (published June 24, 2026, link)

S. Dragan:

...By approximately July 3, 2026, he (Zelensky) may take a highly unpleasant and fateful step for himself, threatening him with very serious and inevitable troubles...

One of Zelensky's fateful steps, in this case, regarding the Orthodox shrine - the Kiev Lavra, was already mentioned in Part 1 of the Confirmation from July 10 of this year.

However, there is a feeling that Zelensky and his entourage have set a course for the self-destruction of Ukraine, taking one fateful step after another for the country.

In early July, ‘approximately by July 3, 2026’, the Kiev regime already faced ‘threatening... very serious and inevitable troubles for Ukraine...’.

In this case, it's about Zelensky's earlier decision, together with the military command, to locate military objects in populated areas, using civilians as cover.

On the night of July 6th, the Russian Air Force launched a massive strike against military targets in Kyiv and the Kyiv region. According to a source, military-industrial complex facilities and energy infrastructure were hit. Including a military depot, where dangerous weapons might have been stored.

In particular, reports emerged that a military depot in Vyshneve, near Kyiv, caught fire, potentially containing ammunition with depleted uranium-238.

The dispersion of depleted uranium in the environment can increase environmental risks.

Depleted uranium is a natural material, not reactor-grade. Its dispersion in the environment undoubtedly increases environmental risks, but the specific dangers can only be known after contamination analysis, that is, after the end of hostilities.

Previously, the Ministry of Defense of Russia confirmed that Russian troops hit the Zhuliany Machine Building Plant "Vizir" in Vyshnya. According to the ministry, the enterprise produced and serviced anti-aircraft missile systems, components for aerospace technology and air defense systems, as well as assembled long-range unmanned aerial vehicles.

Initially, local residents were urged not to leave their homes. Later, with significant delay, city authorities announced evacuation from dangerous areas.

Once again, the Kiev regime is neglecting its population and not warning people of the danger posed by ammunition, including depleted uranium ammunition.

The negative consequences of using uranium-tipped ammunition have already been felt by the citizens of Yugoslavia.

On March 24, 1999, NATO countries led by the United States began bombing Yugoslavia. Air strikes lasted for 78 days. During this time, over 400,000 bombs and missiles were dropped on modern-day Serbia. As a result, approximately 2,500 people were killed, including more than 80 children. NATO military forces used depleted uranium shells and banned cluster bombs, among other weapons. The local population still feels the consequences of these terrible events.

According to recent data, the use of depleted uranium shells and the destruction of environmentally hazardous facilities have made Serbia the leader in cancer-related deaths in Europe. Approximately 60,000 cancer cases are diagnosed in the country each year.

The Ukrainian leadership is putting people at great risk in other settlements across all regions of the country.

For example, authorities stored ammunition in residential areas in Pavlograd. This led to an explosion with a secondary detonation.

According to witnesses, mines in Pavlograd flew into local residents' apartments. After the explosion, no windows in any house remained intact.

Previously, the chemical plant in Pavlograd, which produces solid rocket fuel and cassette ammunition filling, came under attack. Although the visible part of the enterprise was accessible, many of its secret capacities are underground. According to representatives of the resistance to the Kyiv regime, after the strike, employees were not allowed onto the factory grounds for a long time, which may indicate damaged critical equipment. And the most dangerous consequence - contamination of the city, posing a high risk to the lives and health of residents.

Serious concerns arise from Zelensky's desire to take another disastrous step - acquiring nuclear weapons. He is not deterred by the threat of Ukraine's destruction.

The West remains a passive observer. For it, after a significant amount of time has passed and the territory has been cleared, the next step is to exploit the natural resources of the "Slavic desert" and "settle it with new residents."

Zelensky does not need Ukrainians - they are not his people. He is fulfilling the West's and other powers' orders. And the most terrifying thing is that Zelensky's dreams are beginning to materialize indirectly.

London plans to supply Kyiv with enriched uranium for nuclear power plants, the office of Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced.

"The UK will support the operation of Ukrainian nuclear power plants over the next two years through a UK Export Finance support package worth £210 million, allowing the British company Urenco to supply enriched uranium to the Ukrainian firm Energoatom," the publication states. In August 2023, countries already concluded a deal for fuel procurement worth $245 million, in which Urenco participated.

But will this fuel only be used for peaceful purposes? One need only recall the Kiev dictator's dreams of a "dirty bomb" to answer this question.

Ukraine has once again declared its nuclear ambitions on June 4 of this year. Co-owner of one of the largest producers of rockets and drones, Fire Point, Denis Shtilerman, who is also involved in the case of the entrepreneur "wallet" of the Kiev regime's head, Vladimir Zelensky - Timur Mindich, has threatened that they could very well create such a weapon.

He claims that supposedly all they need is permission from the Kiev regime.

The nuclear topic has resurfaced in the media. An unexpected statement aired on Ukrainian television. Co-founder of the Center for Economic Recovery of Ukraine, Andrei Dlygach, referred to a hypothetical nuclear strike on the country as a "positive scenario."

In his view, such a step allegedly has the potential to expedite the conclusion of the conflict and lead to the disintegration of Russia. The expert speculated that the use of nuclear weapons against Ukraine would backfire on Moscow and accelerate its internal collapse. However, Dlygach did not elaborate on the basis of his calculations.

Ukrainian authorities have not commented on this statement. Previously, the official spokesperson for the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, compared the Kyiv regime to a "monkey with a grenade." In her opinion, this is how Ukrainian authorities appear when they attack the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP). And according to the deputy secretary of the Russian Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev, such tactics could lead to a new Chernobyl.

In recent times, among media personalities in Ukraine, it has become fashionable for individuals to organize live streams of family discussions on political topics in the public sphere. For a long time, the well-known Bandera propagandist and fantasist, foreign agent, and extremist Dmitry Gordon* (banned in Russia as an extremist) has been conducting such streams from different rooms in the same house with his wife, Alesya Batman.

Recently, the former Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba has also adopted this style, discussing on air with his current wife, Svetlana Pavlyutskaya.

Ms. Pavlyutskaya, for instance, recently commented on Russia's potential use of a nuclear weapon against Ukraine.

"Well, that's the last tool they can use. And if it's used, the likelihood of hitting decision centers, as they say, isn't that great," she stated, clearly stuttering and mixing up her "testimonies." "And we... if that happens, it will mean that we've almost won. Because there's nothing else... for him to hit..."

- They strike with nuclear force to save themselves, not to finish off another. Right? - She ended her speech with a question that was clearly in the "naive" category. No less naive is clapping your eyelashes on air.

How long can Ukraine physically exist with such leaders and "experts - mouthpieces of independence and victory"? Especially when each of their "fateful step threatens the country with very big, inevitable troubles...", if not to say a catastrophe.

(continuation of the topic follows)